Introducing Criminology, Sentencing and the Penal System: Themes, Trends and Challenges
Developing Penal Policy
Key Issues
What is Punishment?
Key features of punishment include:
It rests on a moral foundation, expressing a moral judgment
Punishment stems from an authoritative source, usually the state.
Feinberg: censure or condemnation is the defining feature of punishment
There are two classical theories of punishment:
Retributivism: punishment is linked to the culpability of the individual and matches the severity of the punishment to the seriousness of the crime and culpability of the offender.
Utilitarianism: people are motivated by the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain, and so social and penal policies should be used to promote the greatest happiness of the greatest number.
Links to deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation
Equality, fairness, and justice
Penal policies are made with consideration on equality and fairness as:
Some groups may be selected for harsher punishment.
Or apparently neutral policies have differential impact e.g. a fixed fine would be far worse on the poorer.
“Populist punitiveness” (Bottoms): where governments increase punitiveness to appeal to the public – used to justify increases in sentence severity
Human rights
Human rights are an important mechanism for theories of punishment:
Natural rights are significant to retributivist theory, which recognises the right of the offender to be treated with respect as an autonomous human being.
Rights are used to criticise utilitarianism (which strongly influenced the UK penal system), as utilitarianism sacrifices the individual’s rights for the wider public interest.
Rights are important for penal reformers:
Rights are good in protecting prisoners and their rights
Respect for human rights makes a system of punishment more legitimate
BUT not all reformers believe in a rights approach
E.g. some Marxists theorists distrust rights because they are essentially individualist rather than collectivist, and because they fail to deliver substantive justice.
There are problems with defining rights in jurisprudence – there is disagreement over what rights mean and what they entail, etc.
BUT one agreement is that there are fundamental rights existing beyond positive law – rights protect the individual from the state.
The ECtHR is an important influence on sentencing and penal policy – it has led to changes such as in treatment of offenders in prison, with increasing weight placed on the right to life, to procedural rights, etc.
Key influences
1) The role of political imperatives (political context)
The political demand for social order has been seen as a key element to increases in incarceration – e.g. the 2011 England riots, when the Coalition govt was criticised for its failure to keep the streets safe and for the time taken to restore order.
Powerful interest groups can also affect policy – e.g. the Prison Reform Trust of victim movements.
Political need to pursue policies and practices deemed by the public as legitimate conflicts with economic imperatives – which priority wins depends on when the policy will be implemented.
2) The role of economic reasons (economic context)
In UK: conflict between Ministry of Justice and the Treasury over penal policy.
The costs of crime and punishment are:
Running costs – cost per prisoner in 2012/13 was 35 000.
Capital costs of building prisons.
Indirect costs – welfare support for dependants affected by imprisonment of the breadwinner and cost to the national economy with the loss of productive labour.
Spending on the prison and probation system in England and Wales had grown by 36% from 2004 to 2010 in real costs.
The costs of crime and punishment are paid by:
individuals who pay increased insurance premiums; and
the public whose funds finance law enforcement and punishment.
Solutions to the conflict between economic burdens and the public demand to reduce crime:
Represent fines and community penalties as punitive to win public support for them.
Privatise entire prisons or certain services within prisons – New Public Governance (Osborne)
What to punish – minor infringements vs more serious crimes
How to punish – a community sentence is cheaper than a custodial sentence.
The death penalty is NOT cheaper
How much to punish – a heavier sentence is more expensive but could offer more opportunities for rehabilitation and thus cuts costs in the long term.
The prison population is at a record high, so government needs to balance public demand for to reduce crime with the economic burdens.
3) The role of public opinion and the media (social context)
Public opinion is expressed through elections, polls, focus groups, etc.
Since the late 1980s, public opinion in UK has been more favourable to punishment as the main response to criminal behaviour
The populist punitiveness of govts can be problematic – it reinforces the view that crime can be controlled through punishment and leads to problems when harsher punishment does not succeed in this.
The views and attitudes of the public:
Most of our knowledge of public opinion comes from the British Crime Survey – has confirmed a high level of fear of crime in the UK.
Public opinion may be based on inaccurate views – there is a mistaken belief that crime is on the rise (BCS found that 60% of people thought crime rose in the country in 2010)
Yet it fell from 1995 to 2004 and continued to decline over the next decade (albeit less sharply and with fluctuations).
The public tend to underestimate the severity of the criminal justice system in dealing with crime.
The BCS showed that public confidence in the ability of the system to bring offenders to justice and reduce crime have increased since 2008.
Case Study: prisoners’ voting rights:
McNulty et al found that media was heavily skewed towards opposition for prisoners’ votes. The arguments were framed in terms of a threat to parliamentary...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.