Diversion, discretion and legitimacy
Bottoms and Tankebe (2017) Police Legitimacy and the Authority of the State
Legitimacy and Justification
Bernard Williams:
First political question” for any society is how to secure order safety trust, or cooperation, before considering other issues such as health and education
To thus create this sense of stability, need certain people to have greater power than others – a “rule”
Power-holders need to develop narratives of legitimation, as to why they are the solution to societal problems
In contemporary societies, the judgement of legitimacy depends on context in the relevant time and place
Thus may advocate for a primarily empirical approach to legitimacy that will work on a bedrock of moral commitments
“Belief in Legitimacy” or “Justified by Moral Beliefs”
Beetham: legitimacy must be understood “in given social contexts rather than independent of any particular context”
He focuses research attention on the justifications offered by power-holders, and how these justifications are responded to by citizens
He says there are three components of legitimacy that are universal in form, but which vary in their specific content in different societies:
The legality of the actions of power-holders
The justifiability of the actions of power-holders in terms of the shared values within that society
Expressions of consent by citizens (actions conferring legitimacy)
Policing and the enforcement of state authority
Weber: defined the state as a ruling political organisation that, within a given territorial area, “successfully upholds the claim to the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force in the enforcement of its order”
Importance of policing in relation to issues of public order and public protection is both physical and symbolic
Physical: US Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices: where the police applied a diverse array of approaches (not simply law enforcement) in a focused way, the research showed moderate to strong evidence of effectiveness in crime reduction
Symbolic: Innes points need to consider that police intervention depends upon and pivots around communication
Practices such as stop and search communicate powerful messages concerning whether the state truly values the citizenship and equality of those who live under its protection
“Policing by consent” and the basic legitimation demand
Idea that the police can, in the last resort, only retain full authority and effectiveness with the consent of the general population
Relates back to Williams’ idea that a state is only legitimate if the claimed authority of the power-holders has been justified
Legitimate state meets the “Basic Legitimation Demand” – a demand by subjects that the power-holder should provide adequate justification of their claim to rule
A legitimation for every citizen?
Concept of legitimate policing can be rephrased as policing where there is congruence between the system and the practices of policing, on the one hand, and the societal beliefs, values and expectations that provide its justification, on the other.
Williams’ concept of the basic legitimation demand then helps us to sharpen that formulation by insisting that the police must always be willing to offer justifications for their actions to each citizen with whom they interact
Williams and Weber
Look to longer notes
Responding justifiably to the basic legitimation demand
Authors suggest some content for justifiable police responses to the basic legitimation demands of those who are policed.
B and T suggest a fourfold conceptualisation of the potential components of criminal justice legitimacy, as viewed by those subject to state power: 1) procedural justice, 2) distributive justice, 3) effectiveness, and 4) lawfulness.
Procedural Justice
This is the fairness of the process employed to reach specific outcomes or decisions; it includes both the quality of decision making and the quality of treatment of citizens.
B and T say citizens often prioritise procedural justice (how they are treated) over the perceived favourability or fairness of the outcome of their encounter with the police.
Why is it so important?
The Group Value Model (Lind and Tyler (1988)) suggests when police recognise individuals’ rights, it makes the individual feel valued. The converse applies when police treat individuals poorly – they are telling those groups that they have marginal status in society.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00289.x
Distributive Justice
This involves distributions of things that fall to be divided among those who have a share in the constitution (Aristotle).
However distributive injustice occurs when there is over or under enforcement of certain groups e.g. more police stops for black people, etc.
Groups who experience over or under enforcement tend to blame the police for what they have experienced, leading to a diminution of legitimacy.
Effectiveness
Beetham noted that the police need to be reasonably successful in achieving results to be legitimate – vigilantism supports the claim that ineffectiveness leads to loss of legitimacy
e.g. in Nigeria lack of police response against violence robberies contributed to the rise of the Bakassi Boys, a vigilante group.
Groups like vigilantes and mafia do provide protection like police, but are different because they do so in a manner that threatens safety of others and without notions of justice and accountability – so they are NOT legitimate.
Lawfulness
Power should be acquired and exercised in accordance with established rules, both formally legal and in convention – those who enforce the law must do so while loyal to the law alone (free from bias and prejudice).
E.g. police often appeal to legal provisions as the basis for their actions like coercive powers.
When police fail to do so, there is deep disquiet and loss of confidence in police.
Police unlawfulness can be...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.