This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Lyus v Prowsa [1982] 1 WLR 1044

Country:
United Kingdom
Reviewed By Oxbridge Law Team
Updated 04/01/2024 07:02
  • X had mortgaged land to Y before giving a right over it to Plaintiff. The right was not registered and not overriding. Nevertheless, Y, after repossession, decided to sell to Defendant subject to an understanding that the sale was subject to Plaintiff’s right.

  • Defendant then claimed that his interest was not subject to Plaintiff’s right, since Plaintiff’s right had not been registered and was not an overriding interest.

  • The court found for Plaintiff, stating that in accepting the contract with Y, Defendant had agreed to hold the right for Plaintiff on constructive trust and to allow him to deny the right’s validity would be to allow the LRA 1925 to facilitate fraud - Dillon J 

Any comments or edits about this case?
Get in touch
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
  • 'Oxbridge Notes' prizewinning note marketplace has been serving students since 2010 with premium study materials
  • Reap the benefits of joined-up learning and earn higher grades, just like our 75,000+ happy customers.
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.